Quote:
Originally posted by mika
Theking. why can't you be a man and admit that your logic is seriously flawed?
I'l prove it once and for all
1st example (fictional, but shows the point)
It's March
51% support Bush's decision to start a war
Mika blames Bush for war
(According to theking Mika also blames American people for the war)
Then it's April
38% support Bush's decision to start a war
Mika blames Bush for war
(According to theking Mika doesn't blame American people for the war, since the people have changed their mind and don't support the original decision any more, they say they were wrong a month earlier, for example, no chemical weapons were ever found anywhere )
Now how can I blame Bush for the war all the time, and in March also blame the people for the war, but not in April anymore, since the support dropped? Can it be that I blame someone for something one day, but not the next day?
If you can refute this, I'll give a more decisive argument against your stupid logic, the logic that you use in order to make me look like I blamed American people for the war
|
The current situation is, Bush supports the war-Congress supports the war-the American people support the war thus the American people support the President and Congress but you only want to say that you blame Bush and the Congress but you do not want to say that you want to blame the American people whom are the ultimate supporters of the whole deal. Inconsistent and illogical, end of discussion.