View Single Post
Old 03-26-2003, 04:40 PM  
mika
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally posted by theking


No. You stated that you blame Bush and our government (Congress) and I pointed out to you that the majority of Americans support Bush and our Congress in this conflict, so it stands to reason that you would have to also blame the American people in order to be consistent. Blame and hate are not synonymous.
Theking. why can't you be a man and admit that your logic is seriously flawed?

I'l prove it once and for all

1st example (fictional, but shows the point)

It's March
51% support Bush's decision to start a war
Mika blames Bush for war
(According to theking Mika also blames American people for the war)

Then it's April
38% support Bush's decision to start a war
Mika blames Bush for war
(According to theking Mika doesn't blame American people for the war, since the people have changed their mind and don't support the original decision any more, they say they were wrong a month earlier, for example, no chemical weapons were ever found anywhere )

Now how can I blame Bush for the war all the time, and in March also blame the people for the war, but not in April anymore, since the support dropped? Can it be that I blame someone for something one day, but not the next day?

If you can refute this, I'll give a more decisive argument against your stupid logic, the logic that you use in order to make me look like I blamed American people for the war
mika is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote