Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
That wasn't the point. The point is, this was your big theory and fact: he said "pull it". That's it. Two words, taken out of context. TWO WORDS.
When other people have provided very long logical explanations from various sources. Using the same text taken in context, reviewed by numerous people.
If you want to be Mr. Conspiracy Theory. Then you should at least play on a level ground. Have your facts straight, and actually use relevant information. Your argument is so minuscule you aren't even at straw man level yet.  |
Bingo. People like Kandah can't possibly hold their arguments to the same level they hold others to, because it just falls apart on the face.
Here's a good example:
Quote:
Originally Posted by kandah
No spin huh? For starters it's produced by the BBC. Second I found this little text on the bottom of the page you linked: "9/11 Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower is directed by Mike Rudin, and produced for the BBC, part of a series investigating and debunking widely held conspiracy theories, while also exploring the inconsistencies and holes in the official accounts."
So this documentary is not neutral it has the agenda of debunking the conspiracy theories.
|
So if you set out to debunk the official account of what happened, you're an open minded individual seeking out the truth. On the other hand, if you set out to debunk a conspiracy theory, then you can just easily be dismissed as not being neutral.