View Single Post
Old 12-28-2008, 07:09 PM  
Chris Malais
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by PSSuperstars View Post
Uh, there are more singular black lab attacks because there are more black labs out there, duh. Black labs become a "family friendly" dog... then when the kid pulls its tail.. there's an "attack" which is usually just a nip... but it's mostly suburbanites who own them... so they end up rushing to the ER clinic on the corner to report the bite...


Now... on the other hand.. let's compare unprovoked attacks... ;)
And your precious little pitbulls won't stand a chance in the statistics.

The initial breeding purpose of pitbulls.. at their creation and incarnation onto this earth... was to be a violent attack dog... They were made for that one purpose.

Now, I believe that bad dogs are MADE and not born... in that, a pitbull can be raised around a nurturing family without any stimuli to bring out the bad traits..

However... match a pitbull that's been good for 4-5 years.. with the proper negative stimuli... and it's more apt to attack viciously and in a deadly manner.. than say a dog whose brain and genetics aren't chock full of aggressive hormones and breed patterns.


Quit googling and copying and pasting shit off some ghetto website that's propitbull.

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=a0f_1217364705


This is a good video for you. So there are more labs, therefore there are more lab attacks? What about Asians? There are more Asians than any other race of humans, but oddly there are less reports of abuse by Asian men and Woman. Your logic is severely flawed. More attacks by labs = more attacks by labs however which way you look at it.
__________________
http://www.psychicrevenue.com/pws02901

Free horoscope on your websites. Make some money!
Chris Malais is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote