Quote:
Originally Posted by fuzebox
To play devils advocate here... If I was a ccbill client and they suspended my processing because of a random third party report that I didn't own the content, I would be fucking livid.
|
Strawman argument. Noone is suggesting that they boot anyone after an unjustified complaint. The equation is simple. One webmaster has IDs and documents. The other webmaster has nothing. Case closed. No records, no processing, should be the rule.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Reading this thread there seems to be one theme running through it. CCBILL should be policing content on sites they process for in a very difficult way to do on their own.
They are in this to make a profit so they can stay in business and process for the rest of us. So here are my solutions.
If you don't like the way CCBILL run their business use another processor, if enough do this CCBILL will change.
If you want CCBILL to get hit by multiple DMCAs day after day from multiple content owners suffering from stolen content, then all join Remove Your Content.
Both solutions require you to do something that WILL cost you money. But many seems happy to ask CCBILL to do something the will cost them money and could land them in court and losing. Do you really want that?
|
The current situation has one CCBill client stealing from another CCBill client. I think CCBill clients already pay enough to expect some effort on their part to prevent this. A one-time doc request when adding new sites is not too much to ask. It's neither expensive nor time consuming, and would prevent so much piracy, there's no excuse not to do it.
__________________
BOOBZOOKA: Amateur Affiliate Program featuring
SellYourSexTape: Real couples document their lovelife for one week.
HerBedroomWindow: Girls recording themselves alone at home. |
DareRing: "Truth Or Dare?" themed adult party games.