Quote:
Originally Posted by iseeyou
Millions of people die in hospitals every year.
How can we stop it? The obvious solution is more regulation.
Murder rates are dangerously high in some places.
How can it be reduced? More regulation will certainly help.
When there is a problem, the solution is quite simple. You simply create new regulations.
Regulation always works because the regulators are just and benevolent ... unlike the common man who is quite devious.
Is you support internet regulation, then you are wise and morale. If you oppose internet regulation, then you are an anarchist. People who want to live without government (anarchists) are all criminals who believe theft and destruction are a way of life. Anyone who opposes government regulation is an anarchist ... which means evil, chaotic, robber, murderer, destroyer, rapist. There is nothing worse than an anarchist.
|
If hospitals had less regulation would they save more lives?
If there was no law against murder would it be safer?
No is the answer to both and anyone who thinks regulation can solve everything is a fool. But look at the situation the world is in now. We are in a recession and facing a depression. There are many reasons, one of the main ones is the lack of regulations, the poor ones and the way they were enforced on banking and financial sectors. Do you think we would be better with no regulations at all?
Many are losing their jobs due to the lack of regulations on the Internet. Yet some here think we should have none at all. Do they want the little we have taken away completely or kept as is?
But reading what I posted I see some of you did not read it. So here it is again.
Quote:
|
Censorship. I see no reason other than on extreme violence, under age porn, and terrorist type activities that censorship should have a place on the Internet. However if a country has passed a law that a certain type of content is not available in a shop on their high street why should it be allowed on the Internet?
|
Are you saying that if a country passes a law stating Bestiality for instance is illegal in that country you want to be able to see or sell it there on the Internet? Other than that I said the Internet should not be censored.
Quote:
|
DMCA, it needs updating. The part that holds safe the hosting company from illegal content being uploaded is being abused. It's obvious that the people uploading some of the content to Tube sites do not own it, do not have the right to upload it and are breaking copyright laws. Content producers spend money to SELL their content, not for one person to buy and 10,000 to share.
|
Are you saying the present DMCA law is good enough? Some think it should be done away with completely. Yes that would be good wouldn't it and the result of no regulations.
Quote:
|
2257. The idea that anyone can post porn content without effective proof the models agreed to it and are of legal age is wrong. You need to be able to prove you own content, or have the right to post it, the models agreed to it being published and are of legal age. Today the law requires you have a line of text at the bottom of your pages.
|
So I should be able to put up any content I like with or without the models agreement, proof of age or proof of ownership?
Unlike most of you I have worked in other forms of porn production where laws do matter, I have also worked when censorship was a lot tighter than it was today. I worked and I made a good living. Some of you seem to think it would be the end of porn. You're 101% wrong. Laws and taxes apply to high street shops regarding what they do, can and can't sell. Has porn disappeared from the high street? Have people stopped buying luxury goods because of higher taxes?
No they have not and it shows how wrong you all are.
Damian go read what I said about censorship and think about it. I said nothing except for what an individual country says is legal. Do you think the laws of the UK don't apply to you because you work on the Internet?