View Single Post
Old 12-16-2008, 06:37 PM  
Robbie
Leaner, Meaner, Faster
 
Robbie's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vegas
Posts: 20,959
Quote:
Originally Posted by rankscom View Post
It might be "possible" there were other reasons for those big sites dwindling to nothing... To counter, here are some solo girl sites that have "survived" in this business while still to this day offerring downloads (no DRM):

-Rachel Aziani (since 1999)
-Kelly Madison (since 2000)
-Club Sandy (since 2003)
-4 Real Swingers (since 1999)
-Cathy's Craving (since 1998)
-Lia 19 (since 2004)
-Lady Sonia (since 1999)
-Sammy4U (since 1999)
-Carol Cox (since 1995)
-Naughty Allie (since 2003)
-Dawn's Place (since 1999)
-Catalina Cruz (since ??)

Thes are practicially household names where I come from.
Absolutely. And each and every one of those site owners are pissed about their content being stolen and the adverse affect it has on their sales. But they are afraid (as was I) of the ramifications of trying to find a solution such as encrypted streaming.

Believe me, it was not an easy decision because I was scared of what members might do. And if you ask any of those above sites what they think about it, they will tell you the same thing. They WANT to do something about it. But they aren't sure what will happen.

I finally became fed up with it and tossed the dice. I make enough money as an affiliate with my TGP's (even though our traffic has been decimated by illegit tube sites) to roll the dice and see what happened. If it failed I still had my affiliate income which was more than enough.

But why should any of them try to protect their content when their "reward" would be a negative light from their own affiliates and not even one mention of the positive aspects? Just sayin...
__________________
-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.Com
Robbie is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote