Quote:
Originally posted by NineNine
I agree. But I'm not really sure how many different TGP scripts are out there. If there are a lot, this might be tedious for the programmer. At the least, the forms can all be automated with hahahahahahahahahaha, but this might still be a decent bit of work. If whoever codes this decides not to do this, or if there are too many different script (mine, for example, is a completely custom one that I wrote), something really, really basic should be done to send out the galleries. A text file attachment I think would be the most basic, lowest common denominator. Then people like me could just import the file into our databases.
|
Yep, I agree that e-mailed files are ESSENTIAL. It's a feature that would be easy to implement and universally compatible.
Whereas the auto-submits are highly desirable, but they're not essential. I'm really just suggesting that we explore the viability of adding this feature. Auto-submits are of course possible because that's what galley submit scripts do. So it's really a matter of whether it's too much drama to code.
Quote:
|
Another thing to consider is that everybody has different categories, so some kind of standard category list would have to be created.
|
Yep.
Quote:
|
And one more thing... would it be a more flexible system if, say, for every day that a webmaster did reviews, that webmaster earned credits that allowed for use of galleries? ie: a webmaster reviewed and approved 10 galleries for 30 days, so they'd be entitled to 30 days worth of galleries to be sent to them. Just another idea.
|
Interesting idea, I had not thought of that. But I think that this would make it very difficult to determine how many reviewers are needed. Plus I believe that there's a great advantage in giving someone exclusive responsibility for a specific category. That way they're totally accountable -- if the galleries are crap, or if they fail to review the galleries we know who's head to kick
