GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

d-null · 11-04-2008, 08:26 PM

not a lawyer, but perhaps their lawyers could argue that they are just a filehost and that the onus for documentation falls on the uploaders?

just a guess, but as an example, I don't think google could ever be required to have 2257 documentation even though their image search is full of porn

11-04-2008, 08:26 PM
d-null . . . Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: NY Posts: 13,724	not a lawyer, but perhaps their lawyers could argue that they are just a filehost and that the onus for documentation falls on the uploaders? just a guess, but as an example, I don't think google could ever be required to have 2257 documentation even though their image search is full of porn __________________ __________________ Looking for a custom TUBE SCRIPT that supports massive traffic, load balancing, billing support, and h264 encoding? Hit up Konrad! Looking for designs for your websites or custom tubesite design? Hit up Zuzana Designs Check out the #1 WordPress SEO Plugin: CyberSEO Suite