GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

tnaindex · 11-04-2008, 08:19 PM

First off im talking about tubes that are using stolen content.

From what I have heard they are using the same excuse as youtube "User generated content" How in the hell can a porn site run like that while still being able to produce 2257 documentation? To do so legally, at the very least every clip would need to be approved by an admin after seeing the 2257 doc's.

If we contact the feds and ask them to investigate them on suspicion of child pornography and they are unable to produce 2257 documentation, at the very least it will hopefully get the sites shut down.

If they then turn around and say that they do have evidence that every performer on the site is over 18 then it will prove that they have knowledge of every movie on the site and any good trial lawyer can use that as proof of copyright infringement. Probably best dealt with by a class action by the content producers.

What do you lot think?

11-04-2008, 08:19 PM
tnaindex Registered User Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 26	Shouldnt it be easy to get rid of tubes? First off im talking about tubes that are using stolen content. From what I have heard they are using the same excuse as youtube "User generated content" How in the hell can a porn site run like that while still being able to produce 2257 documentation? To do so legally, at the very least every clip would need to be approved by an admin after seeing the 2257 doc's. If we contact the feds and ask them to investigate them on suspicion of child pornography and they are unable to produce 2257 documentation, at the very least it will hopefully get the sites shut down. If they then turn around and say that they do have evidence that every performer on the site is over 18 then it will prove that they have knowledge of every movie on the site and any good trial lawyer can use that as proof of copyright infringement. Probably best dealt with by a class action by the content producers. What do you lot think?