Quote:
Originally Posted by AlienQ
Ya goto do the same thing with CSS.
Thing is this is so non important, I can hardly think of any sites in the world that are so important to require such redundancy in page display...
This element of discussion is moot, but when someone says CSS is better than Tables because CSS does not require multiple templates proves the person saying so is a fucking moron that is choosing to put out misinformation regarding the facts between the two methods.
Throw in even more dipshits that have no clue and ya get a thread like this.
|
Please take a seat over to the left with your pal Sortie in the tard yard.
You're completely fucking mental...
body {
width: 300px; /* standard compliant browser width */
*width: 299px; /* all the other browsers */
}
is alot better then 300 different pages loading differently via php/apache browser redirect.