Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
It's real simple. There's just no logical reason to use tables over CSS. There's dozens of reasons at least to use CSS over tables.
|
Uhhmm no there is not a reason, have you read the thread or done real research on the matter? Table based design is the widest accepted standard for cross browser compatibility hands down resulting in the firmest conformity in browser display.
THere are other reasons why Table based designs are better over CSS. Thats just 1.
Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
There's only two reasons to use tables over CSS.
1. You don't have the skill to properly write CSS, and you won't learn it.
2. You don't have the money to hire someone good enough to code your shit in CSS.
|
Read above, or better yet go read the W3C site and the comments of the Consortium regarding CSS.
Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
End of discussion. Anyone who tries to say CSS us unstable, hard, or doesn't work properly in all browsers. Simply doesn't know CSS all that well.
|
CSS is unstable thats a fact, as again mentioned at the W3C site numerous times over. CSS infact is the least stable for Browser display stability and cross plat form compatibility.
Infact with Mobile based design Table base design yields the greatest stability in page layout control.
Quote:
Originally Posted by potter
Use whatever you prefer, do whatever you want, and code your site how you see fit. But please don't ever try to "bash CSS", or claim "tables are better". You just sound ignorant when you do.
|
Who is the ignorant one? CSS is over rated unstable shit. It's been proven time and time again at the W3C site and hundreds of designer based forums. CSS is useful to a degree in some cases but I see few arguments that factually put CSS ahead of table based layout and design. CSS may have a future and the future is when CSS is actually easier to utilise and easier to control design elements within a layout with non unpredictable results cross browser and cross platform displays.