As bad as Bush is, cuz I think he sucks, I do think the Iraqi leader
Saddam has to go. Should have been rid of with the first Bush but since they are bumbling idiots I hope this time Saddam is out.
Saddam has blood all over his hands from all sides of Iraq.
Iraq could be a beautiful country however their leader has squandered every opportunity by murder and unfair war practices against the geneva convention.
Kurds (his own people on the land) are dead by his hand are estimated at over 60,000 Lives + those still suffering.
If Saddam stayed in power only more suffering can happen.
If Saddam is not removed we got another Castro on the world map which is seriously problematic with exception of a huge Oil reserve at his feet. THe fucker has already proven he wont hesitate to use unfair weapons of war.
I do indeed hope that the war is quick and decisive with few civilian casualties and military casualties.
Logic is simply how can the world community think that it is fine for Saddam to commit serious war crimes against his own people remain in power? Is it fine for a leader to kill 10's of thousands of his own people to remain in the modern world?
Milosovich, that guy is a milk fed puppy when standing next to Saddam at least Milosovich didnt use nukes and chem weapons.
Countries that are threatening Veto want cheap Oil and they are getting it right now (France) and thier actions only prolong the suffering of the people of Iraq and the French know it.
Oh what this thread is about Canada. Oh yeah pardon me, but if I recall alot of Canadian power is French based so a neutral (opposing) stance is of course... Logical.
Concerning Canadian Adult webmasters?
You guys kick ass and I will have a Canadian drink, or girl at full price!
