View Single Post
Old 03-17-2003, 09:18 AM  
BigFish
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: United States of America
Posts: 1,159
Quote:
Originally posted by stocktrader23


That isn't the point at all. Bush has already made it clear that we are going forward with or without U.N. support. With that being a given why not go ahead and let them vote? At least then we would know who is really with us and against us now and appease the people that want the U.N. vote either way. We have to play this political game for many years to come and the slap in the face to the system is not going to help the U.S. in the future.

By the way, if the new polls can be taken at face value a majority of U.S. citizens would have still supported the war with a no vote from the U.N. on the new resolution.

Regardless of where you stand on this war this is one dance that should have gone on.
What do you mean it's not the point? The U.N., which was created by the U.S., is there to enforce international laws, is it not? France is obviously going to VETO anything regarding IRAQ so why sit there and waste MORE time?
BigFish is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote