Quote:
Originally posted by Gman.357
IF and when Iraq is attacked, and then suddenly America comes under fire from terrorist cells within our borders while we are at war overseas, would that then be enough evidence for you that Saddam does have ties to terrorism in some way shape or form?
I mean, he did basically claim to bring the war overseas if Iraq is attacked, did he not?
|
First of all, why the "IF" . There is no "IF" just "WHEN". That has been pretty clear for the past 3 months....
Secondly, why the "SUDDENLY" . This implies surprise , astonishment. It should be no surprise that the US and it's citizen's be attacked in any part of ther world.
This is called retaliation, not terrorism. If you say it is terrorism, then when Israeli troops enter Gaza and kills Palestinians, that would also be terrorism, not retaliation.....
And the key words are: "bring the war overseas if Iraq is attacked, did he not? "
Sadaam Hussein is not starting this armed confrontation, the US - UK are. If you theaten to punch me in the face, I cannot do much till you actually do so. Then I am in my right to retaliate and defend myself.
If you try to kill me, I can kill you and I will be acquiited in a court of law for :self defense".
From the moment the US declare wars on Iraq, all will let loose and yes there is going to be more terrorism, amd many innocent victims. That's the price that your administration is imposing on the whole world.