Quote:
Originally posted by punkworld
Oh, you're saying now that you're one of the sheep who actually believes that Iraq was involved in 9/11?
Don't make me laugh.
I am following what the CIA said: Saddam is no threat whatsoever, except if he is attacked.
|
I'm not here to start arguing, I think everyone has a pretty good idea where everyone stands regarding this war by now... but I do have a question.
IF and when Iraq is attacked, and then suddenly America comes under fire from terrorist cells within our borders while we are at war overseas, would that then be enough evidence for you that Saddam does have ties to terrorism in some way shape or form?
I mean, he did basically claim to bring the war overseas if Iraq is attacked, did he not? How would he be able to do that if he didn't mean through terrorism? Did he make a Freudian slip there, admitting that he does have terrorist ties? How would you explain terrorist attacks on our shores should they occur because of an attack on Iraq, IN LIGHT of what Saddam said above?