Quote:
Originally Posted by Shameless
here's another image I sorta like. even though I prefer to shoot in an 'editorial style' with augmented natural lite I do use strobes as part of my lighting arsenal. this was lit with 2 strobes, some reflectors and quartz. I hope you enjoy it.
*what is an "editorial style?" since I thought style was something individual. Editorial meaning magazine? So that would mean magazine style, and there's hundreds of magazines out there with thousands of photographer shooting for them in their own style. So would that make this a style with no style? This is porn correct? Nice pictures though.
and as with the previous image: no airbrushing.
**They might not be airbrushed but you definatley ran them through a softening program in photoshop, one of the highlight / skin softening programs. This is definatly not an out of camera picture. I just think we should all be a little more hones here if we are being open. But once again, nice pictures.
|
you didn't read the post correctly. I did state the images have been run though a skin smoothing process in post. however the highlights are from how I lit the shot.
you're doing mental jumping jacks with the 'editorial style' business. I usually shoot with a more natural 'editorial' style. see pic:
this is a shot, while lit by me, has to my thinking a more editorial view than say a shot of a woman standing in a living room lit by unnatural lite sources posing for no viable 'motivated' reason. hence my comment about 'editorial style'.
I will no amend that statement to 'cinematic style' just for you. happy now?
-bmb