Quote:
Originally Posted by CrkMStanz
I would hazard some guesses....
It cost you money to license the DRM technology
It was easily broken (have done it myself) - therefore useless
Lots of website subscribers DO want to download and keep 'what they paid for'
ergo: a waste of the content providers money
|
costs more than losing content to freeloaders? and i thought DRM allowed people to download and keep files with the proper settings?
as for breaking, well yeah i can understand that. i figure that would have gotten better with time though