Quote:
Originally posted by WebLegal
I'm afraid that I have to disagree with you on that. Far from the "only needing a signed piece of paper", we require complete 18 USC 2257 documentation from new publishers, so that we can confirm that they know what is going on, and how they are to comply with the law. I don't want to be listing someone that is going to fall through in the pinch. I find it amusing how many people express an interest to be a publisher, and then disappear when I require them to provide paperwork before I get started with them.
I'm happy to report that there hasn't been one incident yet where a customer asked for paperwork for a legitimate purpose, and didn't get it sent back to them post haste. Period.
Oh, by the way, I love that "countries of dubious ethics and morals" bit. Everyone in the country gets painted with one big, broad brush, eh?
|
Don't I remember you posting up a picture of a Ukrainian passort that was so obviosly forged it was a joke. You took it down pretty quick when everyone started to laugh at it.
You had to go and ask the photographer, a regular supplier, for a new one. Which made me think; are they all like this or is this a one off? Either way strange.
I hope now you are giving 2257 documentation with all your sets, so the webmaster can check themselves.
However I would like to poing out that I found David very straight to deal with, when we were trying to go via the brokering route. He had about 15 (I think) of our sets and in 2 months send us $75.
