Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
There's a difference between consuming and wanting to, though.
Its not to say that fucking a model before/during/after a shoot is necessarily a bad thing, but there are those of us who exercise self-restraint for one reason or another. Its a personal call. A producer can still create a product that's 'consumable' without sampling the goods during the production. Sure, the temptation may be there (like a drug dealer and his own supply) - but some of us choose not to indulge.
|
And some of us choose to indulge. If the model is willing. Comparing sex to drugs is lame.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilentKnight
Models that fuck are only a segment of the industry - not the entire industry. Having been in the industry 30 years yourself...you know this. Take BDSM/fetish models for instance. Stacy Burke, Darla Crane and Eve Ellis (three of the more well-known names over the past few years) all command wages around $2-3k per half day shoot without fucking on camera.
|
Not talking about on camera. Talking about the freedom to make the choice of whether to enjoy ourselves or not. Having been in the industry 30 years I know that models who are free to choose and choose to, are generally better models. Just wilder and more open. Shooting girls turned on and wanting to is so much easier and more profitable than shooting girls doing a job and not wanting to.
The success of porn is not about the number of shelves filled or clicks sent, it's based on us providing the consumer with a product he believes. Now tell me a girl faking it is more believable than a girl doing it for real.
Yes I'm biased. I now share my life with a girl who had sex with me on a casting. If I had been like some here I would still be single. Nothing will convince me that's better.