View Single Post
Old 09-14-2008, 06:09 AM  
SilentKnight
Megan Fox's fluffer
 
SilentKnight's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: shooting pool in Elysium
Posts: 24,818
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
How can you expect to create something that's meant to be consumed without wanting to consume it yourself. Applies to a cake, to a painting, to porn. I used the word create, hot churn out.
There's a difference between consuming and wanting to, though.

Its not to say that fucking a model before/during/after a shoot is necessarily a bad thing, but there are those of us who exercise self-restraint for one reason or another. Its a personal call. A producer can still create a product that's 'consumable' without sampling the goods during the production. Sure, the temptation may be there (like a drug dealer and his own supply) - but some of us choose not to indulge.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
We work in an industry where girls have chosen to fuck for money. The idea that a girl will not fuck to get more money is stupid.
Models that fuck are only a segment of the industry - not the entire industry. Having been in the industry 30 years yourself...you know this. Take BDSM/fetish models for instance. Stacy Burke, Darla Crane and Eve Ellis (three of the more well-known names over the past few years) all command wages around $2-3k per half day shoot without fucking on camera.
SilentKnight is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote