Server admins, need your opinion...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • PhillipB
    Just a Simple Carpenter
    • May 2003
    • 1338

    #1

    Server admins, need your opinion...

    So I'm having an argument with a friend of mine and I would like to know your thoughts on the subject. When creating usernames and passwords for a server, I think it's better to use strong usernames with strong passwords. It seems that a bunch of random characters for the username (and obviously the password) would make it harder for a hacker to guess/brute force attack. My friend seems to disagree because he says usernames are stored unencrypted in various locations on a server and are easily discoverable anyway...so there really is no added level of security by using a strong username. What are your thoughts...do you guys use simple or strong usernames and why?
  • darksoul
    Confirmed User
    • Apr 2002
    • 4997

    #2
    Your friend is right.
    Using strong usernames is security by obscurity and it doesn't work.
    Let me ask you something, do you change your "root" user to something else ?
    1337 5y54|)m1n: 157717888
    BM-2cUBw4B2fgiYAfjkE7JvWaJMiUXD96n9tN
    Cambooth

    Comment

    • zagi
      Confirmed User
      • Jan 2004
      • 1238

      #3
      Darksoul does have a great point, if you are using strong usernames then you should include the 'root' user as well, or disable direct root login.

      Regardless, I would actually agree with Phillip - strong usernames are another layer of security, and although it might not increase it by much as user's are available plaintext in say /etc/passwd - it is still better because by default there is no way for a remote user to view these files. They would have to compromise the server to begin with in order to see these plaintext files. So from a complete remote breakin point, strong usernames are a plus.
      Managed US/NL Hosting [ [Reality Check Network ]
      Dell XEON Servers + 1/2/3 TB Packages ICQ: 4-930-562

      Comment

      • PhillipB
        Just a Simple Carpenter
        • May 2003
        • 1338

        #4
        Thanks for your thoughts. You're right, if your server was compromised, it really doesn't matter what you choose for a username. So you have to make it harder to bust in to the server. I mean we still see some brute force attempts from time to time and thus my inclination is to make it twice as hard to guess the user/pass. Or is that not a correct way of thinking?

        Comment

        • darksoul
          Confirmed User
          • Apr 2002
          • 4997

          #5
          Originally posted by APN Philip
          Thanks for your thoughts. You're right, if your server was compromised, it really doesn't matter what you choose for a username. So you have to make it harder to bust in to the server. I mean we still see some brute force attempts from time to time and thus my inclination is to make it twice as hard to guess the user/pass. Or is that not a correct way of thinking?
          the correct way would be top stop those bruteforce attacks which you shouldn't allow in the first place.
          1337 5y54|)m1n: 157717888
          BM-2cUBw4B2fgiYAfjkE7JvWaJMiUXD96n9tN
          Cambooth

          Comment

          Working...