View Single Post
Old 09-06-2008, 08:36 PM  
faxxaff
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Marina Hemingway
Posts: 2,134
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie View Post
No..you are NOT "sharing" in the chargeback.

You are getting the money deducted that you MADE on that sale when a chargeback occurs. You are NOT "sharing" the biller fee of 6 to 7 dollars (depending on which processor in the cascade) and you are definitely NOT sharing the $55 fee that the bank charges us for every chargeback on TOP of the money lost from the sale being bad.

So when we get a chargeback for claudia-marie.com, I end up eating $34.99 for the sale lost. Plus 55 dollars. For a nice total cost of $89.99 You don't share ANY of that cost.

Nor any of the other costs of business that I have to put out. Hosting, shooting, paying talent, editing, 10 to 12 hours a day of working, legal fees, costs associated with 2257, the list is fucking endless.
You need to start reading posts before you reply. I said I would be more than happy to shoulder my part of a charge back if I would need to! I would also be fine to promote sites on 10% or 20% revshare if the site has quality content and is not over exposed. It could still be killer business! It's up to a program owner to set a payout. Don't ask me why they offer so much for affiliates. They are insane to spend more money on affiliates than on content and backend!
__________________
Asian Babes
faxxaff is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote