Quote:
Originally Posted by WiredGuy
Its not the charge I want to hide, but I just don't see why MS should be making $30-$40/mn where I'm doing nothing more than accessing a server remotely, its essentially a private machine where I'd be running my own client, no IIS or hosting would be on it. In my point of view it should be the same as buying Win XP for Home use (1 time license) and that's it, not a monthly fee.
WG
|
cant you run a VM on a unix server that you already have?