Quote:
Originally Posted by Snake Doctor
You wanting McCain to win does not equal McCain winning. Thanks for proving your racism against blacks though.
You can't compare Obama's mother with Palin's daughter because Obama had no control or influence over what his mother did before (or after) he was born.
I think the personal family shit shouldn't matter. However, it is relevant because Palin and republicans like her don't want us teaching our kids about condoms and other methods of safe sex. They want us teaching our kids to not have sex at all, and the education begins and ends there.
The end result of that sort of "education" is Palin's daughter.....who might not be pregnant had someone explained safe sex to her.
If you set a standard, then you have to live up to it. The reason Palin gets shit about her daughter that the Clinton's never got over Chelsea is because 1) Chelsea was never pregnant, and 2) The Clinton's weren't sticking their nose in other people's bedrooms.
People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.
Again, thanks for explaining why you decided to trash the black underclass in New Orleans and suggest that the city should be abandoned, BUT Cuban immigrants who just got here yesterday do deserve hurricane relief from the federal government.
You have to be a special kind of stupid to compare Palin's children to Obama's parents.
Obama had absolutely no influence over what his parents did or didn't do before or after he was born. Palin has major influence over her daughter, and again, it wouldn't be an issue if she wasn't a vocal opponent of sex education.
As a matter of fact, IF Chelsea had been pregnant, the conservatives of the 90's would have said that it was Hillary's fault for pursuing her own ambitions and neglecting her duty to raise her children.
Apparently that's not the case for an abmitious woman who opposes abortion and has an (R) after her name though.
See, the argument for abstinence only sex education goes like this.
Conservative: We should teach our children to not have sex before marriage. This is the only way to be 100% safe from pregnancy and disease, plus it's morally right.
Liberal: We can tell our kids not to have sex all we want, but alot of them are still going to have sex, so we should also teach them about condoms and other forms of protection, in case they decide not to heed our advice and have sex anyways.
Conservative: Well assuming ahead of time that your kids won't listen must mean you're not a very good parent, my children listen to me, you should do a better job of raising your children. Besides, if you show a 15 year old boy a condom and his thoughts will turn to lust.
Liberal: If you show a 15 year old boy a lug wrench........
Anyways, that's the point. It's important because they (conservatives) made it important.
I don't care if Larry Craig wants to suck a cock. I care that he sucks cock while bashing gays as a member of the Senate.
I don't care if David Vitter wants to fuck hookers, I care that he ran for election based largely on his "moral christian values" while he was fucking hookers.
I don't care if Sarah Palin's daughter is pregnant, I care that she's telling me I shouldn't teach my kids about condoms while her daughter is getting knocked up.
mmmmkay?
|
You really are stupid. I am not racist moron. I said this country will not vote in a black man and it will not. It is not ready for that or a woman president. As much as we all claim to be ready for both, the truth is that we are not ready for either. If parents did their jobs in the first place, the schools would not have to teach sex ed. Many parents do not want to talk to their kids about sex at all, they expect the schools to do that. As for Palin's daughter at her age she knew what condoms and birth control pills were. In this country you have to live under a rock to not know about those. I also can not believe you woud use the Clintons as an example. They did not have the time to stick their noses in other people's bedrooms. Bill was to busy having his dick sucked by interns. I am sure there was more then just Monica.
I also did explain about New Orleans and Miami. It was explained very clearly. One group likes to live off the government. It is not just black people that like to live off of welfare and I never said it was just black people either. The other group comes here and actually works a work and they do. The link I posted in that thread was proof enough of all of the people that mooched off of the government in New Orleans. Look at the crime rate and welfare rate of Texas after all the Katrina victims moved there. Both are much higher then they were before the hurricane.