Quote:
Originally Posted by Barefootsies
Exactly.
It's more a less correcting some low level retard who thinks he knows something about case law. We've shown he doesn't have the stones. He also admitted it was illegal, and now says he's "game on". The lawyers should have a field day.
|
i am 4/4 on my predictions.
the only way you can claim i am wrong is by misrepresenting what i say (ignoring the fact that i said it was illegal more than 12 post before you called me out)
I am perfectly willing to take this to the courts, if you want to go there, just post your sites. I will signup and then back up everything to the torrent sites. When the take down request comes i will dispute based on the points i have made.
Quote:
I doubt PussyCash who sponsors shows where they have seminars on these types of issues, including copyright, torrents, lawsuits, tube sites, is not a fan of someone admitting to these practices.
But I'll ask them in Atlanta. 
|
pussy cash is immune to the damage from piracy because they get it moving to live processes is a solution that tv programs saw and did.
IF you want to keep making money even though the laws are against taking down tube sites and torrent sites signup with them.
they will continue to make money no matter how much digital content gets pirated.
That being said if they don't want someone who can only be refuted by misrepresenting what he says. who is perfectly willing to put up his own money in court to argue a principle of law that he thinks is right. And who arguement only prove their benefit (immunity to piracy conserns) then so be it. Tell them to send me an email i will swap out the banner to another live sponsor.