Quote:
Originally Posted by Shai West
Wow. As a relative noob, maybe I don't understand the depth of all these hypothetical repercussions everyone keeps throwing out there. I do see that a chick doing web porn is now making more money than she was before this vid leaked, or was released, or whatever the truth is. I also know that there is someone out there named Foxy Jacky, a fact I did not possess before this little incident.
I won't get into the pro's and con's of "stretching" or pushing the envelope, because the punishment will be different a hundred times for a hundred girls. I only draw from my experience (limited as it may be) as a solo girl and affiliate. In my humble opinion, she arrived in style, if no less.
I've been shooting public in way more controversial places than a playground, and apparently haven't impressed anyone so far. So the mere fact that it got her a little recognition accidently is a big uplift for a girl like me.xxx
|
You sound like an earnest person, so here's some candour for you :
Don't be fooled by these idiots. The entire scene, including all the so called exposure, and the branding and whatnot has contributed measurably nothing to traffic volumes, and there's quite the gap between traffic and sales still to be scaled. You can discover this for yourself by comparing the rankings of melissamidwest.com and jackyfoxy.com.
The owners have a source of hits, which they turned on for jacky when they got her online. Thus traffic shoots up to the level of what they've got, and stays there. STAYS THERE. All through the grandiose exposure event, stays glued to the level.