Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
when are you going to get it thru you head that a legal precedent does not just apply to the very limited scope in which is it first applied. The requirement is not limited to only to the sampling of 29 second video as is this case, but is broad enought to apply to every fair use that exists.
|
When are you going to get it through your very thick head that legal precedent has been set time and time again. If you want to go and find them do a search on Google for Copyright violations and convictions. You have to be clutching at straws here.
Maybe it's a reflection on the company in your signature.
Fair use is fine and no one complains about fair use of our products. Someone putting up a site and using stolen content is not fair use. When are you going to get that into your thick head?