Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
that my point, before companies like mine and removeyourcontent.com didn't have to worry about fair use, we could hire know nothing grunts to send out the takedown notices.
You can no longer just assume that because i made it and your using it, it's a violation.
You have to devote resource to determining if that use is authorized by the copyright acts fair use statutes.
|
So your going for the fair use hair. Unless I am very confused a lot of your posts have been about the argument of such fair use and copies for archive and so forth. Going back to beta max and such rulings. Do I have the wrong person?
I am the copyright holder. I did file for copyright status. The only potential for fair use would be small snippets for review purposes, or in some instances parody. Personal backup does not extend to a shared network no matter how you slice it and even if you only back up a tiny portion of the whole. It still is very damn cut and dry under 99.9% of all cases even with that ruling which had more to do with sending fake take down notices.