Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
No, Paul is dead nuts on the money with what he said. A lot of today's shot-for-internet porn is pure garbage quality with too much yapping going on on both sides of the camera, lame fake moaning, disinterested actors, and everything else he pointed out.
Some of us may have 10+ (or in Paul's case 30+) years of pouring through miles of porn from a webmaster's perspective, but not all of us have lost the ability to think like a surfer as well.
But I don't think all that crap porn is hurting the industry. I think it leaves the door wide open for those who have learned to shoot GREAT porn.
|
I know how many sites buy so maybe privileged on this side. Most buy on price alone, sites asking for 5 solo girl scenes for $1500 should think long and hard before shouting about "quality" scenes.
You are dead right about quality sites with great porn, they are surviving.