Quote:
Originally Posted by Karupted Charles
It was not shot by kids and with your years of experience I would have thought you would know to watch your mouth when making comments like that.
Second just because you were bored by it and found it tasteless does not mean its not what 90% of people want to see. We learned a long time ago to think based on members and feedback not on what we like. Out of our most popular models i would only call 2 or 3 super hot. Most of the ones I absolutely love and would be a member for are not rated above a 7 on our site. The reason is what I like and want to see based on watching porn 8 hours a day is not what joe shmoe middle america wants to see.
|
No, Paul is dead nuts on the money with what he said. A lot of today's shot-for-internet porn is pure garbage quality with too much yapping going on on both sides of the camera, lame fake moaning, disinterested actors, and everything else he pointed out.
Some of us may have 10+ (or in Paul's case 30+) years of pouring through miles of porn from a webmaster's perspective, but not all of us have lost the ability to think like a surfer as well.
But I don't think all that crap porn is hurting the industry. I think it leaves the door wide open for those who have learned to shoot GREAT porn.