Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoc
I can answer you with basic logic... It's 1, 2, 3, just follow me.
If you have a $50 min payout, that's 2 sales to get paid.
If you have a $200 min payout, that's 5-6 sales.
So, either a frauding webmaster will have to produce 5-6 sales in a period, probably flagging them at the processor level, stopping all sales from that point, which is what us programs want. Or, they will role into two periods, giving the program a chance to have not paid on the first round of fraud, and still giving the processor a better chance to catch if the program missed it.
What's more amazing is, fraudulent webmasters actually send real sales with frauded cc sales, even on accounts that have been paid legit funds in the past. They also contact the program and ask why they haven't been paid, and argue that it isn't fraud, even threat they will take it to the boards.
Now, I'm really good at explaining things like 30 different ways for, slower people. If you need me to explain it again, a different way, I will.
|
You are foolish and arrogant to assume people around you are slow.
Your reply has no basis in logic or in reality.
To think that major credit card processors need 7 or more days to catch fraudulent transactions is complete ridiculous.
If it took them seven days to catch up with the fraud they would all be broke and shut down exactly one week ago.
You obviously have no idea how vast, intricate and efficient the global credit card system is.
Once again, quadrupling the minimum payout is not a fraud reduction measure.