Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberxxx
Have I told you about the US aircraft-carriers? There is no other weapon against them, so if the US will use their aircraft-carriers against Russia (which is more than likely), Russia will use nukes. Is that so complicated to understand? 
I don't want the WWIII. But right now we are moving to it and moving very fast  |
You're concept of simulated warfare events is beyond stupidity.
Believe me I am all for having a great discussion about military tactics, strategy and what if scenerio's.
However...
For the time being there will be no American Russian confrontation. Infact I predict there will never be one.
However Soviet tactics against American Military weaponry is like saying what if Rabbit's attacked Foxes? In such an event the assault is brief for the rabbit before being shredded to pieces.
T-72's are outdated by almost 40 years in technology and barely upto date from WWII. American Pershing tanks from WWII have a good chance to kill T72's.
THe American M1 would destroy T72's in droves before even having to resupply for ammo and have near zero problems. Russian Aircraft are good enough to take out French made warplanes but could never stand up to American Raptors for more than 5 minutes before being wiped out of the sky.
CHiuna's Naval fleet is more dangerous than Russia's any day of the week.
Why doesnt Russia need or pursue Aircraft Carriers? The answer is simple the Military aim and scope of Russia does not require them. I can go on and on about these kind of things and the only thing Russian Military has going for it is this. Sheer numbers. Russia has alot of shit to blow up and the only question in such a simulated war is how long would it take America to dismantle and would America run out of Ammo in the process?
THe Nuke question is moot as the nukes now can easily be shot down with American technology in the missile defense shields. Not a single Soviet Nuke would land in any American protected zone.