Quote:
Originally Posted by sharphead
Difference here is I know alot about Angelaina Jolie, her accomplishments, some of her talents, etc etc. Learning she has a similar tattoo doesn't really change my opinion of her, since there's so much else to know. Unfortunately, we know nothing about this girl and only have that tattoo to start off on (Is she emo or something? Because to me - it sure sounds like something a emo would say...I might be completely wrong but that's my point) .. kinda confuses people if you know what I mean - some people will be turned off by it, because they don't know anything else about the girl to offset it. This is why it's dangerous for models to be tattooing their bodies with nonsense lines and being promoted the way they do, from some unknown girl with a hot body, to porn star with a tagline on her pussy...
To be honest, if your going to build a site around a girl with tattoos like that, at least build it into the site and build her online persona around it... it's going to be there for every nude shot she does, so to draw in your members, help them understand it better.
|
so true.
putting tattoos on a girl adds nothing, only detracts, and depreciates.
like putting pinstripes on a mercedes S class.
from a life long economic standpoint the very worst decision a pretty girl can make is to vandalize her beauty (which is her "currency" during the prime mating years of 18-25) with tattoos.
it lessens her pool of marriageable mates, and because of that it determines the quality of her life and her offsprings' life.
true, the tow truck driver will think it's cool and might even marry her. and the young kid in med school might even fuck her also, but he probably will not get serious about her enough to marry her.
and that's the way it is. women can marry "up" if they can bring beauty to the equation, but it will be very difficult for them to enter the upper middle class with tatts.