Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie
Didn't you know? gideongallery is an expert on it. He can tell you 1000 ways to make money off of other people's work. But not ONE way to make money with his own work, that is IF he ever did any. He is the greatest armchair lawyer of all times when it pertains to stealing from others. And he'll even explain to you in great detail how stealing your content and making money off of it...isn't even stealing!
|
piracy is not stealing never was nor will it ever be stealing. If you use the criminality test for theft for copyright infringment everyone is guilty included all the people who fully licienced the content for use.
What i am saying is not only true but the only sane and logical statement. Copyright infringement is a fraud, and fraud is no more legal then theft. The difference is stating it as fraud doesn't false criminalize non criminal actions (like your misrepresentation as theft).
Quote:
|
He says he lives in Canada. But he should move here to the U.S. and work for the govt. He would fit in perfectly. Remember when "Weapons Of Mass Destruction" meant nuclear bombs? Or back when a pedo was a guy that had sex with pre-pubescents?
|
no thanks you may consider US the land of the free, but to many of your politicans are bought and paid for by RIAA, MPAA.
Quote:
gideongallery is perfect at changing the meanings of words to fit his agenda.
And his agenda is the absolute defense of the poor common man.
|
i am not the one who keeps misrepresent a fraud as theft (when you know the criminality test -- posssion without ownership makes everyone guility)
I am not the one making unfounded declarations that i am "stealing" (when you know my statements are truly unbias because i make no money from tube sites, nor lose money from tube sites)
Quote:
|
You see gideongallery wants nothing more than a utopia where we evil content producers stop trying to "monopolize" our own hard work and allow gideongallery and the millions of other poor homeless people to make money off of it.
|
All i want you as a copyright holder to do is respect the fair use defined by the copyright act. I don't think that is unreasonable since it was the trade off you agreed to give the government in exchange for the monopoly the us governement granted you.
Quote:
The sooner you understand this, the better. Now everybody please sign over everything you own to gideongallery. He has "fair use" of every damn thing you've ever done. 
|
At current count i have said explictly declared if that is the case sue them because that would be infringment (or some paraphrasing of that statment) 28 times already.
Your just upset because i don't misrepresent perfectly legal actions as crimes.
at current count i am 90% right so far, when i objected to the "make available" ruling you guys all told me i was wrong yet the judge who made the ruling admitted he may have been
wrong
I was the only person who predicted that viacom would agree to getting only sanatised version of the logs they requested (
and explained the trap that google set that forced this) while people like paul tried to argue they should have a right to use that information to sue uploaders.