View Single Post
Old 08-03-2008, 08:53 AM  
Noe
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by mynameisjim View Post
I think to start that in your 30's is a bit foolish. If you plan on living to 80, you shouldn't take anything for 50 years. And I doubt you will want to stop. There's really no substance you can take for several decades, especially a compound with such profound effects on virtually every system in your body, that won't have some negative side effects after that period of time.

If I was in my 50's and feeling terrible, I would give it a try. But in my 30's or 40s...too risky. But everyone has the freedom to do as they choose.
I would have to disagree with you and ask what your knowledge is of HGH, and where you heard that there are negative side affects after several decades. According to your theory that there's no substance that you can take over a long period of time without eventually having negative side effects, then what about vitamins? To me, HGH is extremely comparitive to vitamins. Of course the dosage that I take is much less than somoene in their 50's, but the reason that I'm taking it is so that I can have optimal health not only now, but more importantly for those later years.
Noe is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote