Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty F
Its that simple.
Also there are sound recordings, which i heard on tv and which are public of a guy who was involved on a high level with the wtc towers, who knew a lot about its structure etc. After the plane hit it he went up to those levels to see if he could rescue people. You hear him saying in that recording (hes on the phone with a ground crew) that hes afraid that the building might collapse because of the huge damage.
And then stupid pricks like Mediaguy come here with their "evidence" saying there wasnt much damage..
|
I also heard one guy say he'd "pull" the building.
I also heard detonations and explosions in the raw footage.
So did firefighters:
http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html...stories&st=cse
According to studies, there's proof of not "Bombs" in the buildings but cutter charges and steel-melting compounds which after doing their work would have caused the creaking you could sense in the lower floors minutes before the collapse. Fires that were starting to go out sixty stories above couldn't have caused that.
http://www.bentham-open.org/pages/co...1/35TOCIEJ.SGM
Then there's corroded steel which couldn't happen with a fire. New York Times, even FEMA reported on that
http://www.fema.gov/rebuild/mat/wtcstudy.shtm.
The NIST reported ignored the topic.
In fact NIST presented facts and made statements which wouldn't lead most readers to the same conclusions it reached; they were separate from the report. As if they knew people would read either the facts or the conclusions. Read both and see.