Quote:
Originally Posted by Walrus
You're turning the tables to suit your own feelings. GatorB's viewpoint is NOT shared by most people. His viewpoint IS refreshing. Most people share your same profiling views of pit bulls. I am very sorry that your dog was attacked. That was a terrible thing to happen to him. And a terrible ordeal for you both to have to go through.
But you stated in the thread you just linked to that you believe the pit bulls were owned by meth addicts. And that the pits had possibly attacked and killed a dog before the attack on your's.
Don't you see? It's always the pit bulls owned by unsavory owners. This happened in the 1970s with the German Shepherd. People wanted that breed banned too. Then it was the Doberman Pinscher in the 80s. The Rottweiller in the 90s... and now it's the Pit bulls. Blame the deed, not the breed.
|
Don't I see what? That one pit bull owner was a meth addict and abused his dogs? Yes, I do see that.
I also see stories of others pits who have had good owners and still end up killing.
There is nothing anybody can say or do to change my opinion. I never liked pits before the attack and I will certainly never like them now.
Anybody who thinks that pit bulls aren't one of the most dangerous dogs is a complete fool.