Quote:
Originally Posted by WarChild
"Fraudulent intent" is the key. You are suggesting that if I give you a counterfeit bill and you accept it without knowing, that you'd be breaking the law for possession. That's simply not true.
|
Sir, you are having dificulty understanding how a court will establish "Fraudulent intent".
If the fake bill is in a frame on your wall, then no "Fraudulent intent".
If you put six knowingly fake bills into your pocket and walk to the store then that is
enough to establish "Fraudulent intent" wether you ever get to the store or not.
Next, they will surely search your home for more and if they find a stack of fake
bills then fradulent intent it clear based on the quantity of bills alone.
You are trying to argue somthing simlar to this :
"Officer, you can only charge me with possession but not "dealing" because I had no intent to sale my personal stash of 65 tons of cocaine".
You are falsely assuming that society will let you get away with the crime because they
can't read your mind to establish intent.
And it's quite fucking funny. I mean, don't you realize that I could be on the jury.
I'm not going to buy your bullshit story that you aint a crook.
If you can't fool me than why do you think you can fool a system full of people that
are more hardass than I ever dreamed of being.
This is a joke.