Quote:
Originally Posted by CDSmith
I don't "continue to argue" anything here sir. I made one post on this subject, and I stand by it. As I said, it may not match the true definition or the court's definition of theft, but I can still recognize as a thinking person that it absolutely is a form of it.
Of course if I ever need to press charges against someone for it I'll be more than happy to nail them for fraud as well as anything else they deserve, and won't quibble over the neverending semantics that you seem to want to continue to argue over.
Existing laws aside, if you or anyone else can't see the theft aspect of copyright infringement, there's something wrong with you.
|
IT doesn't matter what the facts are i am right because i say so defense.
changing the context of a crime, changes the crime, it makes things that are legal, illegal so it is VERY important to get the terminology correct.
It interesting you refused to answer the question but still decided to "continue arguing with me" .