Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief
I disagree. I think Google is going about this pretty smartly. They don't have much real quality content they can put postrolls in front of that people would accept, I agree. However stuff like:
https://youtube.com/user/journeymanpictures
or
https://youtube.com/user/AlJazeeraEnglish
Two of my own subscriptions I'd definitely put up with a preroll to watch. And with the lawsuit on the table, I think this is stuff you won't really see the other major players wanting to pirate and sells ads next to if people don't want to put up with the pre-roll on youtube. If it is some 1 or 2 minute clip than no, but if it is a quality piece running 5-10+ minutes long that interests me it wouldn't phase me a bit. And I'd imagine once they start doing it companies with quality stuff might actually be tempted to put it on there with the hopes of getting a decent return.
Lawsuits aside, which could have a big impact on youtube (though I doubt they will lose outright if at all), I think Google will eventually turn it into a profitable enterprise - though perhaps they may not be able to monetize the percentage of videos initially predicted - it will have give them a firm foot in the video advertising door no doubt. If you have a look at the 'show partner only videos' option it seems to me Google is taking on 'partners' like crazy, and just about anyone with non-pirated stuff and a few views is getting picked up. I'd imagine their revenue numbers should climb pretty impressively from here.
|
Meaning to divide the content into channels that have its targeted audience already?
Definitely the way to go, but at the end, what we talk about is again programming for targeted audience, which is somewhat a departure from the original share your videos 2.0. model.