Quote:
Originally posted by TheFLY
We don't really know for sure if anyone was disrupting business, or if the guy with the shirt was even a part of the previous allegations of a disruption... Where's the proof? How many of these shirts were sold? For all you know this father/son team bought the shirts somewhere else... Unless the Mall has some photo documentation of the same guy wearing the same shirt causing a disruption -- these are just retarded allegations.
Just the fact that the mall sold the shirts is just the icing on the cake -- if you buy a shirt in the mall, you should be allowed to wear it in the mall that sold it to you. Obviously the mall approved of the shirt to sell it in the first place -- now they can't go out and arrest people for wearing what they sold!
Bottom line is the guy was arrested for wearing a shirt the mall sold him.
|
You also don't know if he WASN'T causing controversy. But what you do know from the article is that 20 people just 3 months prior were involved in the same incident with security mall. TWENTY people were protesting but when asked to leave, they left, so NOBODY got arrested. You still with me here? He didn't get arrested because he "was wearing a SHIRT" OBVIOUSLY. The wearing of the shirt led up to what ultimately caused him to get arrested, which was his refusal to leave. He got arrested because he refused to obey an order by security personel to leave the premises, which is private property.