Quote:
Originally posted by 12clicks
The issue is private property. the issue is people dressed exactly the same way disrupting business in the past. Now you can pretend its about free speech and pretend its about discrimination but all you'd do is be pretending. 
|
We don't really know for sure if anyone was disrupting business, or if the guy with the shirt was even a part of the previous allegations of a disruption... Where's the proof? How many of these shirts were sold? For all you know this father/son team bought the shirts somewhere else... Unless the Mall has some photo documentation of the same guy wearing the same shirt causing a disruption -- these are just retarded allegations.
Just the fact that the mall sold the shirts is just the icing on the cake -- if you buy a shirt in the mall, you should be allowed to wear it in the mall that sold it to you. Obviously the mall approved of the shirt to sell it in the first place -- now they can't go out and arrest people for wearing what they sold!
Bottom line is the guy was arrested for wearing a shirt the mall sold him.
