Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn
One could say just as easily say the State of California or the Federal Government itself does not want porn being filmed in California based on John's case or Max's case and many more. Those other recent in-state cases don't really bolster the argument, since they had other issues in play, from underaged girls to drugs and Max of course had to fly 3000 miles from the Chateau du max to go to Tampa to defend himself.
For what it is worth, individual adult industry attorneys will often tell their clients not to do many things that other industry companies actually do, even disagreeing with one another over what those things are. Remember the Cambria list? All you guys filming interracial better watch out! Just saying, what you describe as an obvious conclusion to single one state out as it it was unique doesn't make sense in light of the many other legal pitfalls that befall unfortunate companies in various places including CA itself. The bottom line is that everyone should be careful wherever they are located in the US and hope that they don't attract unwanted attention.
|
I am in agreement with you that everyone in the adult industry should be careful. I know this is not something that most people want to hear, but it would almost be better to have a government review board than regulates adult video production than the system we have now.
What seperates Florida from California is that there have been two convictions there in the last month. Max was tired before in California and was found not guility.