Quote:
Originally Posted by ShellyCrash
You can't expect someone to martyr themselves through a vicious court battle with their freedom on the line, but I do have hope that maybe the word will get out and this could be used by other attys fighting similar battles against obscenty charges, like the one Max Hardcore is losing locally here in Tampa.
What do you guys think? Am I the only one that thinks geotargeted Google search popularity data could help in the defence of people being charged with obcenity?
|
Larry Walters managed to get the size of the community redefined after the DAs pulled their normal BS of having the trial in an anti-porn area.
http://www.avn.com/index.cfm?objectI...C383BC20091D03
I also mentoned to Larry Walters a few years ago to take a look at some studies that show +70% of hard drives contain porn. Start telling the jury that 9 out of 12 of them surf for porn even if they won't admit it.
The MaxHardcore battle is also trying to redefine the definition of community standards to be the people that actually look at the porn, and I think that will eventually pan out.
The GoogleTrends will be another example of hard facts to show that the current "
community standards" definitions(
pre-intenet) are no longer valid for the World-Wide-Web.