Quote:
Originally Posted by ADL Colin
Where did you get that from? The summary explicitly stated that the second amendment is not an unlimited right.
|
whoa whoa you can't have it both ways.
"the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Ok first of all it's says ARMS not GUNS. and WMDs are in fact ARMS. If I can't own WMDs then my right to bear these arms are in fact being infringed.
So it's pretty simple, either indivduals have a right to bear ANY and ALL forms of arms or the 2nd amendment only meant MILITIAS have a right to exist. The fact is that if individuals have a right to bear arms then ALL guns laws INFRINGE on that right and thus are unconstiutional and should be struck down. It's pretty black and white and I'm not so sure why it's so complicated for people to understand that it's either one way or another and they need to choose one and not have this mishmash.