Quote:
Originally Posted by payd2purv
Listen dumbshmucks.
I don't disagree that what VS did and the reason they gave for doing it is valid.
I do disagree that Chrome1 is completely innocent here.
|
the guy is innocent. they reneged on their terms. when their system was first implamented in 1998 any customer you sent them them you got credit for for the life of that customer not the life of your website.
the owners are greedy. greg and chuck stole the company from the other partners when they got 51% of controlling shares in 2001
chuck threatened me with physical violence at trade shows on two separate occasions in front of others.
id trust chrome before i'd trust VS