|
Jago you know I got mad respect for webcams.com and you as well, but at the same time, i think you guys chose poorly.
#1 is shit and looks like something from the 90's. Yes it may use your feeds to an extent but nowhere near the amount that CamQuery does.
#2 Seriously should have won the contest. I will admit I know Sabin personally so it may not be "fair" for me to say that, but what your missing is how Sabin actually took your code (as well as other RSS feed providing sponsors) and not only shows the live models on his site upon the surfer arriving, but once the site assimilates the code it actually archives the information. He went above and beyond what "live feeds" are supposed to do. The site is fully optimized for search engines, shows live models upon every visit, and also pulls you mad traffic from archived profiles made from your feeds that have been indexed by search engines.
As for the deisgns, well, I made stuff better than #1 in 8th grade.
#2 is clean, professional, planned well, and focuses on the content without a lot of distractions.
I dont know if #1 is sending you traffic, but I do know that #2 is an affiliate of Webcams.com and promotes you guys as much as possible.
as far as you saying that CamQuery was built a couple of months prior, you are right, but why would you let someone fully enter a contest if you were going to penalize him for it in the finals?
Regardless, congrats to the winners, Webcams.com is a great affiliate program, I just dont support the final decision of this contest.
|