So if "only half of families" use filters, we take their ability to choose not to away. What an awesome argument.
It's as if they want to require people to collect proof of age, but do absolutely nothing in terms of telling people what they consider valid proof of age.
These days a parent could get a newborn a valid credit card linked to their account. But I guess thats considered legal and valid proof of age? How are the parents who get their kid a CC making a substantially different choice than choosing not to filter their browsers?
clear as mud.
The only thing clear is that the government is so used to stupid people begging them to "fix" things that they do it out of habit now. Making innocent people sign up to a "do not call" list for example. Fuck you, punish the scammers dont force me to sign a list you assholes!
bah. Get it through your thick heads that if a PARENT doesnt filter their kids computer and the kid see's a tit, it's the PARENTS problem, not the governments, and not the web site which is functioning as properly as you've said it must!