Quote:
Originally Posted by bringer
HAIRLESS(shaven) petite girls with NO TITS and braces. at what age does the average kid get braces? senior year of hs?  these are schoolgirls who btw are either shot in a primany school classroom or a pink "kiddie" bed getting a visit from uncle charlie. you just dont think its wrong because they have 2257 stamped on the page so you know no child was exploited and no real crime took place. in the end, if its wrong for 3d nerds to go for the young teen look (under 18=ILLEGAL), it should also be wrong when programs pick and pay models in hopes of achieving the same look.
how old does this girl look to you? click threw and you'll hear about how "daddy's got a secret." awesome toy blocks on that template btw! ccbill?
http://galleries.dirtybabysitter.com...3CCBILL872295/ |
I completely agree with you regarding this... both are wrong to me, but most of the "schoolgirls" out there are not looking like her. At some point, the audience understands the theatral aspect of the scene. The babysitter series has 1-2 "borderline" models but you can clearly see they are legal in outfits. Still, I know a few TGP/MPG that refuse to list the babysitter series. This is what I'm talking about about to NOT SUPPORT this. If the intention is to sell to CP audience, legal or not, it should not be supported from inside the community, starting with private CC processors, MPG/TGP, etc.
A don't remember the name of a sponsor... but they had 15-16 years old looking girls. 2257 legal. I don't support this, but I believe the 15-16 is not what the pedo people are looking into. It is the 5-12 of age... which is easily done via 3D models.